“In general the paper is well written and the data are presented appropriately. However, the authors should take into consideration the following remarks….”
“Still there are some observations and inconsistencies that should be amended, these are listed in order of appearance on the text:…”
“Authors have greatly improved their manuscript and amended all of the reviewer’s comments in an acceptable form.”
“This decision was based on the comments of external experts who carefully peer-reviewed your paper.”
It is really a bad news for us to receive a rejection letter of the manuscript (No.XXXXX), especially after we revised it according to all the reviewers’ comments. It is accepted by all the reviewers that the XXX(研究内容) would be beneficial for a wide range of researchers and readers, as there has been no report on the xxx（研究内容） conditions. More importantly, we found all the reviewers satisfactory with our revised manuscript as shown in the review report, which made us confused about the rejection. Therefore, we hope you could reconsider the decision on the manuscript, and give us a chance.
We made this decision based on the opinion of our editors.